From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 08:47:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 08:46:54 -0500 Received: from [63.95.87.168] ([63.95.87.168]:26889 "HELO xi.linuxpower.cx") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 08:46:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 08:46:40 -0500 From: Gregory Maxwell To: Alan Cox Cc: "Steven N. Hirsch" , Helge Hafting , Nicolas Noble , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel network problem ? Message-ID: <20010109084640.A29867@xi.linuxpower.cx> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.8i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:32:49PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:32:49PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > If I were packaging a Linux distribution, I'd be sure to have ECN disabled > > by default, FWIW. > > Probably the case. However the more people who pester the faulty sites the > better. Did you ask the person how many reports he needed .... > > I certainly intend to run ECN on my mailhost once I trust 2.4 a bit more. > > Alan Is anyone maintaing an automated sweep of sites that I can complain to all at once (for each 2.4 ecn system I install of course) rather then finding them one at a time as my connections fail? :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/