From: Pete Toscano <pete@research.netsol.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@erdfelt.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: Related VIA PCI crazyness?
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:19:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010109121954.B10875@tesla.admin.cto.netsol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010107122800.A636@kantaka.co.uk> <93avg9$rlk$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <93avg9$rlk$1@penguin.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 03:52:41PM -0800
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1772 bytes --]
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[snip]
> If the VIA logic for getting/setting the irq is wrong, it should only be
> a problem if there are devices that _haven't_ been routed by the BIOS.
> Usually these devices are limited to things like USB, ACPI and CardBus
> controllers, and getting the irq routing wrong in that case can be
> deadly (infinite irq streams on the wrong irq line).
hmmmm, interesting that you should mention usb in this conversation.
there's a problem with usb in smp-enabled kernels running on the via
apollo pro 133a chipset. basically, unless apic is disabled, the usb
controller (usb-uhci) doesn't get any interrupts and no usb device will
be recognized. this has existed since the early 2.4.0-test days, if not
earlier.
i was talking with johannes erdfelt about this and he feels that it's a
pci irq routing problem. as of yet, we haven't been able to find anyone
who can help. we do see an occasional message on linux-usb about this
problem though.
> Could anybody with a VIA chip who has the energy please do something for
> me:
> - enable DEBUG in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h
> - do a "/sbin/lspci -xxvvv" on the interrupt routing chip (it's the
> "ISA bridge" chip - the VIA numbers are 82c586, 82c596, the PCI
> numbers for them are 1106:0586 and 1106:0596, I think)
> - do a cat /proc/pci
from a follow-up post, i get the impression that this won't help with
smp-enabled systems, but if there's something similar that you think
might help solve this one, please let me know and i'll be more than
happy to oblige.
thanks,
pete
--
Pete Toscano p:sigsegv@psinet.com w:pete@research.netsol.com
GPG fingerprint: D8F5 A087 9A4C 56BB 8F78 B29C 1FF0 1BA7 9008 2736
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-09 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-07 12:28 Related VIA PCI crazyness? Philip Armstrong
2001-01-07 14:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2001-01-07 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-07 21:02 ` Albert Cranford
2001-01-08 3:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-09 6:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-01-08 2:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2001-01-09 0:53 ` Evan Thompson
2001-01-09 17:19 ` Pete Toscano [this message]
[not found] ` <200101072352.PAA28348@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-01-08 1:44 ` Evan Thompson
2001-01-08 9:08 ` Philip Armstrong
2001-01-10 21:55 ` Philip Armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010109121954.B10875@tesla.admin.cto.netsol.com \
--to=pete@research.netsol.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=johannes@erdfelt.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox