From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Bosko Radivojevic <bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suser checks in 2.2.x
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:39:30 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010109163930.C24523@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010109145610.03b02090@mail.etinc.com> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0101092100320.15661-100000@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0101092100320.15661-100000@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu>; from bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:13:46PM +0100
Em Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:13:46PM +0100, Bosko Radivojevic escreveu:
> I can see there are a lot of suser() checks. When they will be changed
> with appropriate capable(..) checks? Or, will they be changed, at all some
> days?
I assume: as soon as people send patches, I've send two, IIRC, related
to this today. 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-09 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-09 9:12 Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2 Silviu Marin-Caea
2001-01-09 10:17 ` Alessandro Suardi
2001-01-09 10:33 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 Alan Cox
2001-01-09 18:20 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing Silviu Marin-Caea
2001-01-09 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-09 19:57 ` Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
2001-01-09 20:13 ` suser checks in 2.2.x Bosko Radivojevic
2001-01-09 18:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2001-01-10 18:22 ` Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
2001-01-10 20:01 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-10 21:37 ` Dennis
2001-01-10 21:38 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-10 22:08 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-11 10:24 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 10:31 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-11 10:58 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 11:36 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-11 11:58 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 14:00 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 14:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-01-11 16:33 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 16:44 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-12 11:50 ` PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers " Danny ter Haar
2001-01-12 12:01 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-12 12:16 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-12 22:33 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2001-01-15 16:29 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 12:56 ` Drivers " Alan Cox
2001-01-09 10:28 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2 Alan Cox
2001-01-09 16:10 ` [rlug] " Eugen
2001-01-09 19:01 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010109163930.C24523@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox