From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:27:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:27:26 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:43257 "HELO brinquedo.distro.conectiva") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:27:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:39:30 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Bosko Radivojevic Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: suser checks in 2.2.x Message-ID: <20010109163930.C24523@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Bosko Radivojevic , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010109145610.03b02090@mail.etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bole@falcon.etf.bg.ac.yu on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:13:46PM +0100 X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:13:46PM +0100, Bosko Radivojevic escreveu: > I can see there are a lot of suser() checks. When they will be changed > with appropriate capable(..) checks? Or, will they be changed, at all some > days? I assume: as soon as people send patches, I've send two, IIRC, related to this today. 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/