public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mo6 <sjoos@pandora.be>
To: Robert Kaiser <rob@sysgo.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:51:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010110205127.B982@pandora.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01010922090000.02630@rob> <3A5B7F76.ABDFED7A@didntduck.org> <01010922264400.02737@rob>
In-Reply-To: <01010922264400.02737@rob>; from rob@sysgo.de on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote:
> > Robert Kaiser wrote:
> > > I can't seem to get the new 2.4.0 kernel running on a 386 CPU.
> > > The kernel was built for a 386 Processor, Math emulation has been enabled.
> > > I tried three different 386 boards. Execution seems to get as far as
> > > pagetable_init() in arch/i386/mm/init.c, then it falls back into the BIOS as
> > > if someone had pressed the reset button. The same kernel boots fine on
> > > 486 and Pentium Systems.
> > > 
> > > Any ideas/suggestions ?
> > 
> > 
> > is "Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor
> > mode... " the last thing you see before the reset?
> > 
> 
> No, I don't see _any_ messages from the kernel. The last thing I see is
> "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel." 

I dug up an old amd 386 and started compiling kernels for it with gcc 2.95.2:

2.4.0 : doesn't boot, same symptoms as you, Robert, so you're not imagining 
	things :-)
2.2.19pre6 : compiles, boots and runs poifectly
2.3.51 : doesn't compile
2.3.99-pre1 : hrm, *cough*
2.3.99-pre2 : *tsjoum*
2.3.39: compiles and boots okay

here is where I got bored :-)

okay, anyone, which 2.3.x kernels should compile okay ?

With kind regards,
Sven
-- 
If the odds are a million to one against something occurring, chances
are 50-50 it will.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-10 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-09 20:53 Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:15 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 21:17   ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:46     ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 22:17       ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 22:57         ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-09 23:44           ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10  0:19             ` Alex Buell
2001-01-10  0:20             ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10  0:24               ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10 16:00               ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:29                 ` Tom G. Christensen
2001-01-10 22:04                   ` X performance on 2.4.0 v.s. 2.4.0-test12 Alan Olsen
2001-01-09 23:03         ` Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 23:04           ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 23:28             ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-01-09 23:42               ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10  1:48                 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 15:25                   ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:04                     ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 16:28             ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-01-15 18:38               ` [SOLVED + PATCH] " Robert Kaiser
2001-01-15 19:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-09 22:44       ` Timur Tabi
2001-01-09 21:59     ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-10 19:51     ` mo6 [this message]
2001-01-10 20:18       ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-10 21:53         ` mo6
2001-01-11 12:20     ` mo6
2001-01-10  3:53 ` Tom Leete
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-10  9:25 richardj_moore
2001-01-10 14:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 15:04   ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 15:49     ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 16:02       ` Robert Kaiser
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.04.10101101000130.27018-100000@hantana.pdn.ac.lk>
2001-01-10 15:37 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 17:16 Petr Vandrovec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010110205127.B982@pandora.be \
    --to=sjoos@pandora.be \
    --cc=bgerst@didntduck.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob@sysgo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox