From: Danny ter Haar <dth@lin-gen.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Drivers under 2.4
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:58:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010111115833.A27971@lin-gen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010110223836.A7321@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101110003020.30013-100000@prime.sun.ac.za> <93k1k0$87v$1@voyager.cistron.net> <20010111113134.A20569@gruyere.muc.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010111113134.A20569@gruyere.muc.suse.de>; from ak@suse.de on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:31:34AM +0100
According to Andi Kleen:
> "Doesn't work" isn't a very useful bug report. What happens exactly?
> Do the RX/TX/error counters increase when you try to send packets?
no, the counters you see with ifconfig eth0 are set to zero
for rx and to 1 for tx.
So it's trying to send out data but somehow it doesn't work.
Since the driver version is the same (althoud the output is
slihtly different which seems odd) i suspect the PCI
probing to be folded somewhere.
How could i provide people with more info ?
Thanks,
Danny
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-11 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-09 9:12 Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2 Silviu Marin-Caea
2001-01-09 10:17 ` Alessandro Suardi
2001-01-09 10:33 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 Alan Cox
2001-01-09 18:20 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. There is no such thing Silviu Marin-Caea
2001-01-09 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-09 19:57 ` Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
2001-01-09 20:13 ` suser checks in 2.2.x Bosko Radivojevic
2001-01-09 18:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-01-10 18:22 ` Drivers under 2.4 Dennis
2001-01-10 20:01 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-10 21:37 ` Dennis
2001-01-10 21:38 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-10 22:08 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-11 10:24 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 10:31 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-11 10:58 ` Danny ter Haar [this message]
2001-01-11 11:36 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-11 11:58 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 14:00 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 14:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-01-11 16:33 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 16:44 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-12 11:50 ` PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers " Danny ter Haar
2001-01-12 12:01 ` Hans Grobler
2001-01-12 12:16 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-12 22:33 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2001-01-15 16:29 ` Danny ter Haar
2001-01-11 12:56 ` Drivers " Alan Cox
2001-01-09 10:28 ` Failure building 2.4 while running 2.4. Success in building 2.4 while running 2.2 Alan Cox
2001-01-09 16:10 ` [rlug] " Eugen
2001-01-09 19:01 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010111115833.A27971@lin-gen.com \
--to=dth@lin-gen.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox