From: Frank de Lange <frank@unternet.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related?
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:05:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010112210559.B26555@unternet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010112205245.A26555@unternet.org> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101121158050.3010-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101121158050.3010-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:59:25AM -0800
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:59:25AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Could this really be the solution?
>
> I'd like to know _which_ of the two makes a difference (or does it only
> trigger with both of them enabled)? And even then I'm not sure that it is
> "the" solution - both changes to io-apic handling had some reason for
> them. Ingo, what was the focus-cpu thing?
Well, with 'this' (in 'could THIS be') I really meant the move from disable_irq
to the irq_safe spinlocks. I'm currently running with the patched 8390.c
driver, patched io_apic (TARGET_CPUS 0xff) and patched apic.c (focus cpu
enabled), and have had no problems yet... even though I'm running several
simulatnsous nfs cp -rd <big_dir>, streaming network audio, scanning with an
USB scanner, etc.
So far, it seems that the patch to 8390.c removed the symptoms. The changes to
apic.c and io_apic.c did not make the network hang come back.
Cheers//Frank
--
WWWWW _______________________
## o o\ / Frank de Lange \
}# \| / \
##---# _/ <Hacker for Hire> \
#### \ +31-320-252965 /
\ frank@unternet.org /
-------------------------
[ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-12 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-12 17:16 QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 17:33 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 17:51 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 18:25 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 19:04 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 19:07 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 19:21 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 19:33 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 19:52 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-14 0:13 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-01-14 0:23 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 20:05 ` Frank de Lange [this message]
2001-01-12 20:11 ` QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardwarerelated? Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 20:16 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 20:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-12 20:26 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-12 20:35 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 20:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-12 20:46 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-12 20:46 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 20:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-12 21:05 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-15 2:00 ` Jorge Nerin
2001-01-13 0:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 0:19 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-13 0:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-12 20:54 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 21:07 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 21:31 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 23:50 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-12 21:21 ` QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 23:35 ` QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware Alan Cox
2001-01-13 0:06 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-13 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 0:48 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-13 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 1:27 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-13 1:51 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-13 2:11 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-13 1:49 ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-13 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-13 2:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 3:24 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-13 12:37 ` Russell King
2001-01-13 15:18 ` Call for testers: ne2k-pci and io apic (was: Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6...) Manfred Spraul
2001-01-13 23:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-14 0:18 ` Call for testers: ne2k-pci and io apic J . A . Magallon
2001-01-14 0:23 ` Call for testers: ne2k-pci and io apic (was: Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6...) J . A . Magallon
2001-01-14 2:14 ` Call for testers: ne2k-pci and io apic J . A . Magallon
2001-01-15 16:15 ` QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware Zdenek Kabelac
2001-01-13 1:38 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-13 2:10 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-12 17:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-12 18:08 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 18:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-12 18:45 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-12 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 23:27 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-13 0:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-13 0:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-13 0:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-12 19:05 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-15 14:36 ` Roeland Th. Jansen
2001-01-12 22:03 ` Latest status of IDE patches from Andre Jeff Nguyen
[not found] <20010112165104.A22465@unternet.org>
2001-01-16 19:23 ` QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? Maciej W. Rozycki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-12 16:53 Manfred Spraul
2001-01-12 17:02 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-10 21:30 Frank de Lange
2001-01-10 22:21 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-01-10 22:29 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-10 22:40 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-11 11:48 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-11 15:22 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-11 16:55 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-11 19:18 ` Frank de Lange
[not found] ` <3A5E0849.EB428D70@mandrakesoft.com>
2001-01-12 0:28 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 11:40 ` Andrew Morton
2001-01-12 15:06 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 15:36 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-11 19:38 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-11 19:49 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-11 21:09 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-11 21:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-01-11 21:53 ` Frank de Lange
2001-01-12 14:35 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010112210559.B26555@unternet.org \
--to=frank@unternet.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox