From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 18:05:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 18:05:48 -0500 Received: from kamov.deltanet.ro ([193.226.175.3]:6672 "HELO kamov.deltanet.ro") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 18:05:29 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:01:25 +0200 From: Petru Paler To: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64 compile fix Message-ID: <20010114010125.M2734@ppetru.net> In-Reply-To: <20010113152104.B2734@ppetru.net> <14944.56558.198555.536993@pizda.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13i In-Reply-To: <14944.56558.198555.536993@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Petru Paler writes: > > - struct dqblk d; > > + struct dqblk32 d; > > What does this fix? Things compile just fine without > it and looking at the code it was intended to be of > the original type. > > Please explain exactly what submitted patches fix in > the future, thanks. Sorry, my fingers slipped and I sent the mail too fast :( Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that server is down right now). Changing it to dqblk32 got it to compile. Am I doing something else wrong ? -- Petru Paler, mailto:ppetru@ppetru.net http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/