From: James Bottomley <J.E.J.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: David Santinoli <u235@libero.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Partition renumbering under 2.4.0
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:56:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200101171556.KAA01055@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
> Note that the ext2 logical partition is called "hdb9" by 2.2.16 and
> "hdb5" by 2.4.0. This makes it difficult to manage multi-boot systems
> with 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels, as it requires updating fstab between
> boots. Switching to other identification strategies such as ext2
> labels - as discussed in other threads - could be a workaround, as far
> as I know.
Your problem is caused by the identification loop in fs/partitions/msdos.c
having been split into two parts in 2.4. One part identifies msdos and
extended partitions in the first pass and then goes on to identify other
disklabel partitions in the second. You can restore consistency either by
combining the two passes (as was the case in 2.2) or by moving the extended
msdos partition identification into the second pass.
However, the underlying problem remains the same as it was when I first wrote
the solaris code: You only have 11 minors for all of the remaining extended
partitions, that's why the solaris code does the slice renaming. Under 2.4,
if you use devfs, the solaris (and other) slice recognition code could be
enhanced to give the correct names to all the slices. This would turn out to
be something like /dev/ide/hdb2s7 (or something even worse---I'm afraid I only
really know the naming scheme for SCSI devices) but at least you can find the
exact slice you're looking for in an easy and intuitive way.
So, would you prefer the quick fix, or the more durable solution (which would
require you to change your fstab)?
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2001-01-17 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-17 15:56 James Bottomley [this message]
2001-01-19 11:38 ` Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 David Santinoli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-17 11:54 David Santinoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200101171556.KAA01055@localhost.localdomain \
--to=j.e.j.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u235@libero.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox