From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multi-queue scheduler update
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:35:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010119023502.G32087@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010119012616.D32087@athlon.random> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101181956300.8128-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101181956300.8128-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>; from hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:00:16PM -0500
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:00:16PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > > microseconds/yield
> > > # threads 2.2.16-22 2.4 2.4-multi-queue
> > > ------------ --------- -------- ---------------
> > > 16 18.740 4.603 1.455
> >
> > I remeber the O(1) scheduler from Davide Libenzi was beating the mainline O(N)
>
> isn't the normal case (as in "The Right Case to optimize")
> where there are close to zero runnable tasks? what realistic/sane
> scenarios have very large numbers of spinning threads? all server
> situations I can think of do not. not volanomark -loopback, surely!
This is why the numbers with 2/4/8 threads in the runqueue are the most
interesting ones 8)
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-19 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-18 23:53 multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 0:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 0:51 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2001-01-19 1:14 ` John Clemens
2001-01-19 0:52 ` [Lse-tech] " Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 1:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 1:34 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 20:49 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 21:51 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 22:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 22:18 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 23:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 1:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 16:06 ` David Lang
2001-01-19 1:00 ` Mark Hahn
2001-01-19 1:08 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19 1:23 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 1:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-01-19 1:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-01-19 1:48 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19 23:35 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-01-19 0:43 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-01-23 16:49 ` [Lse-tech] " Jun Nakajima
[not found] ` <LYR76657-1923-2001.01.23-08.54.49--mikek#sequent.com@lyris.sequent.com>
2001-01-23 17:08 ` Mike Kravetz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-21 17:49 Jesse Pollard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010119023502.G32087@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox