From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:09:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:09:27 -0500 Received: from vitelus.com ([64.81.36.147]:47112 "EHLO vitelus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:09:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:08:43 -0800 From: Aaron Lehmann To: Daniel Stone Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Message-ID: <20010120160843.A17947@vitelus.com> In-Reply-To: <20010120144616.A16843@vitelus.com> <20010120153403.A17269@vitelus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: ; from daniel@kabuki.eyep.net on Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:08:00AM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > That option seems to conflict with "ipfwadm (2.0-style) support". > > Preferably, I'd like to stay with friendly old ipfwadm rather than > > switching firewalling tools _again_. > > "I'd rather stay with my friendly old pushbike than my car!" > So don't complain when you can't use cruise control. ipfwadm used to support the modules. Why have the modules for ipfwadm been removed from the kernel source? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/