From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:24:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:24:29 -0500 Received: from linuxcare.com.au ([203.29.91.49]:64775 "EHLO front.linuxcare.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:24:17 -0500 From: Anton Blanchard Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:20:33 +1100 To: Sasi Peter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Message-ID: <20010125212033.E14807@linuxcare.com> In-Reply-To: <93t1q7$49c$1@penguin.transmeta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: ; from sape@iq.rulez.org on Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:58:51AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > No plans for samba to use sendfile? Even better make it a tux-like module? > (that would enable Netware-Linux like performance with the standard > kernel... would be cool afterall ;) I have patches for samba to do sendfile. Making a tux module does not make sense to me, especially since we are nowhere near the limits of samba in userspace. Once userspace samba can run no faster, then we should think about other options. Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/