From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 05:50:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 05:50:20 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:24580 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 05:50:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20010126181835.A136@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:18:35 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: LA Walsh , lkml Subject: Re: 2.4 cpu usage... In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: ; from LA Walsh on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:32:55PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > So...I'm bummed. I'm assuming a 30% degradation in an app is probably > not expected behavior? Swap usage is '0' in both OS's (i.e. it's not > a run out of memory issue). Vmware is _not_ application, it is dirty kernel hack. Do it without vmware. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/