From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:43:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:43:28 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:38923 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:43:17 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:43:08 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Andreas Franck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Message-ID: <20010128204308.F5522@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <01012814012000.00354@dg1kfa.ampr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01012814012000.00354@dg1kfa.ampr.org>; from afranck@gmx.de on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:01:20PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 28 2001, Andreas Franck wrote: > Hi Jens, > > I've tested your patch quite as heavy as it gets: I created 5 files of each > 100 MB, set up 5 loop devices and made a RAID5 array out of them, putting > ext2 on it and running a bonnie loop with 350 MB test size over it for the > night. > > Everything survived, worked flawlessly and I'm happy my disk did too :-) > Many thanks for the fine work! Thanks for the testing, it does indeed look promising if it survives a beating like that :-) -- * Jens Axboe * SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/