From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:39:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:38:53 -0500 Received: from theirongiant.zip.net.au ([61.8.0.198]:16645 "EHLO theirongiant.weebeastie.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:38:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:38:54 +1100 From: CaT To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: raiserfs, 2.4.1preX and nfs Message-ID: <20010129093854.C373@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organisation: Furball Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm tempted to use raiserfs on a 45gig raid partition because I don't want to grow old and die before it finishes fscking. The main hassle is that that partition will be NFSed out and in the past there have been mutterings of rfs hacing hassles with nfs. Have these been sorted? Is there anything else I'd need to know about? A journalled fs would be way nice to have and I need to make a decision between ext2 and rfs asap. any help would be greatly appreciated. -- CaT (cat@zip.com.au) *** Jenna has joined the channel. speaking of mental giants.. me, a giant, bullshit And i'm not mental - An IRC session, 20/12/2000 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/