From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:55:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:54:50 -0500 Received: from 04-admin.deltav.hu ([213.163.4.100]:60164 "EHLO oxygene.albi.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:54:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:52:59 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Fs benchmarks? Message-ID: <20010130205259.A4142@supervisor.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: oxygene Linux 2.2.18 i586 From: Z Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On this list new version of XFS for Linux has just been announced. Reiserfs has been included into official kernel tree. My question is about benchmarks beetween XFS and rfs. XFS is said to a very flexible and fast journaling filesystem (well, at least by SGI ;-) and rfs seems to be cool too. It would be important to compare these filesystems. Can you know benchmarks about this topic (ext2 would be usefull to be included as well :) - Gabor --[ Gábor Lénárt ]---[ Vivendi Telecom Hungary ]--[ lgb@supervisor.hu ]-- U have 8 bit comp or chip of them and it's unused or to be sold? Call me! -------[ +36 30 2270823 ]------> LGB <-----[ Linux/UNIX/8bit 4ever ]----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/