public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@winds.org>
Cc: safemode <safemode@voicenet.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:51:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010201215116.A3239@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010201190653.H2341@suse.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102011316210.27273-100000@winds.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102011316210.27273-100000@winds.org>; from gandalf@winds.org on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:20:00PM -0500

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:20:00PM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote:

> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:46:08AM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
> > 
> > > Yeah, by bios does the same thing too on the Abit KT7(a).
> > 
> > Ok, I'll remember this. This is most likely the cause of the problems
> > many people had with the KT7 in the past.
> 
> What cause are you referring to? As far as I know, there are two options to
> increasing the FSB clock.. one increases both FSB+PCICLK, the other just
> increases FSB. If you increase the FSB only, it should keep PCICLK at a solid
> 33. (But I could be wrong, I've never tested that. I can tomorrow though.)

I mean that people can alter the PCI clock on these boards and that 33
doesn't to be always exactly 33 due to rounding errors if used with a
FSB other than 66 or 100 or 133.

Could it be that the PCI bus is not asynchronous, but only
pseudo-synchronous, allowing for divisors of 5, 4.5, 4, 3.5, 3, 2.5, 2?

> > The U33 chips do UDMA timing in PCICLK (T = 30ns @ 33MHz) increments, U66 in
> > PCICLK*2 (T = 15ns @ 33 MHz) increments, and for U100 it's assumed that
> > there is an external 100MHz clock fed to the chip, so that the UDMA timing is
> > in T = 10ns increments independent of the PCICLK. I'm not 100% sure about
> > the last, it might be just PCICLK*3 (T = 10ns @ 33 MHz). An experiment needs
> > to be carried out to verify this.
> 
> I don't have a KT7A personally, I only have a KT7. Can anyone else with a KT7A
> verify this? By verify, I take it you mean to use idebus=33 and overclock
> PCICLK? :) At least that would determine if UDMA100 is based on PCI or an
> external 100MHz source.

Actually he should use the correct idebus= so that the Active/Recover
timings are correct. If KT7A doesn't work with UDMA at high PCI clocks
*even when* idebus= is correct would mean that the UDMA timing is in
1/(PCICLK*3) units instead of units of 10ns.

Anyone help us?

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-01 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101301743180.30535-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-01-31  1:18 ` VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David D.W. Downey
2001-01-31  2:04   ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-31  7:36     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31  7:55       ` David Raufeisen
2001-01-31  9:48         ` safemode
2001-01-31 11:43           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31 12:54           ` Mark Hahn
2001-01-31 19:58             ` David Riley
2001-02-01 12:51               ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-31 20:01             ` safemode
2001-01-31 22:04               ` Tobias Ringstrom
2001-01-31 22:40                 ` safemode
2001-01-31 22:46                   ` Alan Cox
2001-01-31 22:57                     ` safemode
2001-02-01  6:31                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-01  0:46                   ` Byron Stanoszek
2001-02-01  1:52                     ` safemode
2001-02-01  6:52                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-01 11:32                         ` safemode
2001-02-01 16:46                           ` Byron Stanoszek
2001-02-01 18:06                             ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-01 18:20                               ` Byron Stanoszek
2001-02-01 20:51                                 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2001-02-01 21:51                                   ` safemode
2001-02-01 21:56                               ` Alan Chandler
2001-02-01  6:39                     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31 11:39         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-01-31 15:41           ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-30 13:40 Nicholas Knight
2001-01-30 15:03 ` Tobias Ringstrom
2001-01-30 19:51   ` David D.W. Downey
2001-01-30 20:53     ` David Raufeisen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010201215116.A3239@suse.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --cc=gandalf@winds.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=safemode@voicenet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox