Re: sync & asyck i/o

["Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:25:00AM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> > No, we simply omit to instruct them to enable write-back caching.
> > Linux assumes that the WCE (write cache enable) bit in a disk's
> > caching mode page is zero.
> 
> You can not be so blind to omit the command.

Linux has traditionally ignored the issue.  Don't ask me to defend it
--- the last advice I got from anybody who knew SCSI well was that
SCSI disks were defaulting to WCE-disabled.  

Note that disabling SCSI WCE doesn't disable the cache, it just
enforces synchronous completion.  With tagged command queuing,
writeback caching doesn't necessarily mean a huge performance
increase.  But if WCE is being enabled by default on modern SCSI
drives, then that's something which the scsi stack really does need to
fix --- the upper block layers will most definitely break if we have
WCE enabled and we don't set force-unit-access on the scsi commands.

The ll_rw_block interface is perfectly clear: it expects the data to
be written to persistent storage once the buffer_head end_io is
called.  If that's not the case, somebody needs to fix the lower
layers.

Cheers, 
  Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/