Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c, kernel 2.4.1

Augustin Vidovic
2001-02-08T07:36:02Z

On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:23:01PM -0800, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> Intel's documentation states that the bug does NOT exist if the
> bits 0 and 1 in eeprom[3] are 1. Thus, the workaround is correct,
> the printk is wrong.

I wonder if it's not Intel's documentation which is wrong : it seems
that the bug showed up also with the network cards used in my boxes,
and the patch I proposed seemed to fix that problem.

--
Augustin Vidovic http://www.vidovic.org/augustin/
"Nous sommes tous quelque chose de naissance, musicien ou assassin,
mais il faut apprendre le maniement de la harpe ou du couteau."