From: Werner Almesberger <Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.2
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:14:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010222131407.A19635@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010221211330.A21010@cadcamlab.org> <E14Vt3p-0003rp-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E14Vt3p-0003rp-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:33:19AM +0000
Alan Cox wrote:
> I think the key word is actually probably 'predictability'. The Linus tree
> is conservative. (IMHO too conservative and probably in his not conservative
> enough 8))
Hmm, given that there are several patches in your tree that never seem
to make it to Linus' tree, would it make sense to flag patches that
should go into 2.4 as "Not for Alan; Linus _please_ pick it up" (and to
keep on pushing until Linus does) ?
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch /
/_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-22 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <peter@cadcamlab.org>
2001-02-22 2:19 ` Linux-2.4.2 Linus Torvalds
2001-02-21 18:31 ` Linux-2.4.2 John Heil
2001-02-22 3:13 ` Linux-2.4.2 Peter Samuelson
2001-02-22 3:19 ` Linux-2.4.2 Billy Harvey
2001-02-22 4:25 ` Linux-2.4.2 Keith Owens
2001-02-22 3:31 ` Linux-2.4.2 Gregory Maxwell
2001-02-22 10:33 ` Linux-2.4.2 Alan Cox
2001-02-22 12:14 ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2001-02-22 12:27 ` Linux-2.4.2 Alan Cox
2001-02-22 3:32 ` Linux-2.4.2 Linus Torvalds
2001-02-22 10:01 ` Linux-2.4.2 Alan Cox
2001-02-27 21:25 ` another Linux-2.4.2 splat: *** target pattern contains no `%'. Stop David L. Nicol
2001-02-28 0:29 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-22 11:43 ` Linux-2.4.2 J . A . Magallon
2001-02-22 13:26 ` Linux-2.4.2 Adam Sampson
2001-02-22 13:38 ` PATCH: fix the msdos.c compile error Alan Cox
2001-02-22 14:07 ` Linux-2.4.2 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-02-24 0:14 ` Linux-2.4.2 && Minix SP Adam
2001-02-24 1:39 ` Michèl Alexandre Salim
2001-02-22 4:03 Linux-2.4.2 Eloy A. Paris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-22 4:33 Linux-2.4.2 Frédéric L. W. Meunier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010222131407.A19635@almesberger.net \
--to=werner.almesberger@epfl.ch \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox