public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ll_rw_block/submit_bh and request limits
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:57:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010222235700.B30330@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010222223811.A29372@athlon.random> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102221832470.2401-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102221832470.2401-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>; from marcelo@conectiva.com.br on Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 06:40:48PM -0200

On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 06:40:48PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> You want to throttle IO if the amount of on flight data is higher than
> a given percentage of _main memory_. 
> 
> As far as I can see, your patch avoids each individual queue from being
> bigger than the high watermark (which is a percentage of main
> memory). However, you do not avoid multiple queues together from being
> bigger than the high watermark.

I of course see what you mean and I considered but I tend to believe that's a
minor issue and that most machines will be happier without the global unplug
even if without the global limit.

The only reason we added the limit of I/O in flight is to be allowed to have an
huge number of requests so we can do very large reordering and merges in the
elevator with seeking I/O (4k large IO request) _but_ still we don't have to
wait to lock in ram giga of pages before starting the I/O if the I/O was
contigous. We absolutely need such a sanity limit, it would be absolutely
unsane to wait kupdate to submit 10G of ram to a single harddisk before
unplugging on a 30G machine.

It doesn't need to be exactly "if we unplug not exactly after 1/3 of the global
ram is locked then performance sucks or the machine crashes or task gets
killed".  As Jens noticed sync_page_buffers will unplug the queue at some point
if we're low on ram anyways.

The limit just says "unplug after a rasonable limit, after it doesn't matter
anymore to try to delay requests for this harddisk, not matter if there are
still I/O requests available".

However if you have houndred of different queues doing I/O at the same time it
may make a difference, but probably with tons of harddisks you'll also have
tons of ram... In theory we could put a global limit on top of the the
per-queue one. Or we could at least upper bound the total_ram / 3.

Note that 2.4.0 as well doesn't enforce a global limit of packets in flight.
(while in 2.2 the limit is global as it has a shared pool of I/O requests).

Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-22 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-22  9:41 ll_rw_block/submit_bh and request limits Marcelo Tosatti
2001-02-22 13:56 ` Jens Axboe
2001-02-22 18:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-02-22 20:32     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-02-22 21:38     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-02-22 20:40       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-02-22 22:57         ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-02-22 21:44           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-02-22 23:54             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-02-22 23:12           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-02-25 17:34       ` Jens Axboe
2001-02-25 19:26         ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010222235700.B30330@athlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox