From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Mark Swanson <swansma@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 242-ac3 loop bug
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 00:14:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010225001427.B420@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010224173234.14673.qmail@web1301.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010224173234.14673.qmail@web1301.mail.yahoo.com>; from swansma@yahoo.com on Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 09:32:34AM -0800
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]
On Sat, Feb 24 2001, Mark Swanson wrote:
> First, good job on the loop device. It's rock stable for me - except
thanks, glad to hear it.
> when I try to load the blowfish module which oops the kernel and
> crashes the loop device:-) No problem, I just use another cipher.
cipher bug or? never the less, could you ksymoops that and send
it along?
> The bug I'm reporting is that when a loop device is in use the load of
> the machine stays at 1.00 even though nothing is happening. If I umount
> the loop filesystem the load goes down to 0.00.
>
> > ps -aux | grep loop
> 1674 tty1 DW< 0:00 [loop0]
>
> The system is doing nothing to the loop filesystem.
> Strange that the process isn't logging any cpu usage time. It's
> definately responsible for the 1.00 load.
Oops, this slipped by me. Patch should fix it.
--
Jens Axboe
[-- Attachment #2: loop_sig-1 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 546 bytes --]
--- drivers/block/loop.c~ Sat Feb 24 23:08:38 2001
+++ drivers/block/loop.c Sat Feb 24 23:11:13 2001
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@
sprintf(current->comm, "loop%d", lo->lo_number);
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sigmask_lock);
- siginitsetinv(¤t->blocked, sigmask(SIGKILL));
+ sigfillset(¤t->blocked);
flush_signals(current);
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sigmask_lock);
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@
up(&lo->lo_sem);
for (;;) {
- down(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
+ down_interruptible(&lo->lo_bh_mutex);
if (!atomic_read(&lo->lo_pending))
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-24 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-24 17:32 242-ac3 loop bug Mark Swanson
2001-02-24 17:59 ` Doug McNaught
2001-02-24 18:11 ` Mark Swanson
2001-02-24 18:57 ` Doug McNaught
2001-02-24 19:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-02-24 23:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2001-02-25 7:48 ` Mircea Ciocan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-26 0:15 Jonathan Oppenheim
2001-02-26 0:27 ` Jens Axboe
2001-02-26 1:17 ` Mario Hermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010225001427.B420@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swansma@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox