From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:43:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:43:20 -0500 Received: from edtn006530.hs.telusplanet.net ([161.184.137.180]:29452 "EHLO mail.harddata.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:43:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:42:59 -0700 From: Michal Jaegermann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Via-rhine is not finding its interrupts under 2.2.19pre14 Message-ID: <20010227164259.B23026@mail.harddata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5us Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org After I booted 2.2.19pre14 on a system with two via-rhine cards I see the following: via-rhine.c:v1.08b-LK1.0.0 12/14/2000 Written by Donald Becker http://www.scyld.com/network/via-rhine.html eth0: VIA VT3043 Rhine at 0x9400, 00:50:ba:c1:64:d9, IRQ 0. eth0: MII PHY found at address 8, status 0x7809 advertising 05e1 Link 0000. eth1: VIA VT3043 Rhine at 0x8800, 00:50:ba:ab:60:64, IRQ 0. eth1: MII PHY found at address 8, status 0x782d advertising 05e1 Link 0000. and a network does not work due to these IRQ 0, I guess. In contrast when I will boot on the same hardware 2.4.2-ac5 then I get, among other things, via-rhine.c:v1.08b-LK1.1.7 8/9/2000 Written by Donald Becker http://www.scyld.com/network/via-rhine.html PCI: Enabling device 00:09.0 (0094 -> 0097) PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:09.0 PCI: The same IRQ used for device 00:04.2 PCI: The same IRQ used for device 00:04.3 PCI: The same IRQ used for device 00:0d.0 eth0: VIA VT3043 Rhine at 0x9400, 00:50:ba:c1:64:d9, IRQ 9. eth0: MII PHY found at address 8, status 0x7809 advertising 05e1 Link 0000. PCI: Enabling device 00:0c.0 (0094 -> 0097) PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:0c.0 eth1: VIA VT3043 Rhine at 0x8800, 00:50:ba:ab:60:64, IRQ 11. eth1: MII PHY found at address 8, status 0x782d advertising 05e1 Link 0000. Devices in question can be seen here: -[00]-+-00.0 VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] +-01.0-[01]----00.0 ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF +-04.0 VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] +-04.1 VIA Technologies, Inc. Bus Master IDE +-04.2 VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB +-04.3 VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB +-04.4 VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] +-09.0 VIA Technologies, Inc. VT86C100A [Rhine 10/100] +-0a.0 Symbios Logic Inc. (formerly NCR) 53c810 +-0c.0 VIA Technologies, Inc. VT86C100A [Rhine 10/100] +-0d.0 Ensoniq CT5880 [AudioPCI] \-11.0 Promise Technology, Inc. 20265 I do not have turned on a support for USB or audio in either of these two kernels. They are actually configured pretty similar (within a reason :-). But network is operational with 2.4.2-ac5. Hm... Even with these IRQ conflicts for eth0 one would think that eth1 should get its interrupt. It does not conflict with anything. Forgotten 'pci_enable()' somewhere? Michal