From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:32:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:32:07 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:46290 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:32:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 16:29:53 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Ben LaHaise Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Martin Rauh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Writing on raw device with software RAID 0 is slow Message-ID: <20010301162953.R26280@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010301160201.P26280@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from bcrl@redhat.com on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 11:08:13AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 11:08:13AM -0500, Ben LaHaise wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > > Actually, how about making it a sysctl? That's probably the most > reasonable approach for now since the optimal size depends on hardware. Fine with me. --Stephen