public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff)
To: William T Wilson <fluffy@snurgle.org>
Cc: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 12:14:22 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200103031114.MAA13672@cave.bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103030113520.17415-100000@benatar.snurgle.org> from William T Wilson at "Mar 3, 2001 01:14:28 am"

William T Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Matt_Domsch@Dell.com wrote:
> 
> > Linus has spoken, and 2.4.x now requires swap = 2x RAM.
> 
> I think I missed this.  What possible value does this have?  (Not even
> Sun, the original purveyors of the 2x RAM rule, need this any more).

RAM is still about 100x more expensive than HD. So I always recommend
you use about 2% of the money you spent on RAM to pay for the HD space
to handle swap.

Actually the deal is: either use enough swap (about 2x RAM) or use
none at all. 

A "good" operating system will want to use say half your memory for
buffers, even if there are processes using that half of your RAM. Not
when they are actively using it, but only after they have NOT used it
for say an hour. Then the users of the machine will see efficient use
of the resources. It does have the disadvantage that when you come back 
in the morning, your xterm may have been swapped out because of the
nightly backups and stuff....

				Roger. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-03 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-02 21:23 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Matt_Domsch
2001-03-02 23:52 ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-03-03  6:14 ` William T Wilson
2001-03-03 11:14   ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
2001-03-08 13:05     ` Goswin Brederlow
2001-04-27 10:51       ` Xavier Bestel
2001-04-27 11:13         ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-27 20:52           ` LA Walsh
2001-04-27 21:44             ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-27 22:06               ` Thomas Dodd
2001-04-27 22:40               ` Hugh Dickins
2001-04-27 22:40                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-29 15:12                 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-27 22:44               ` LA Walsh
2001-04-28  7:47             ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-27 22:22           ` Wakko Warner
2001-04-28 13:17             ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-28 13:37               ` Wakko Warner
2001-04-28 14:11                 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-28 14:28                   ` J . A . Magallon
2001-04-30 18:12                     ` Alan Cox
2001-05-01 13:00                       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-01 16:14                         ` Rogier Wolff
2001-05-01 16:35                           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-02 10:54                             ` Rogier Wolff
2001-05-02 11:04                               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-02 12:49                                 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-05-02 13:43                                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-02  0:28                         ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-02  0:34                           ` David S. Miller
2001-05-02  0:43                             ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-02  1:14                               ` Roger Larsson
2001-05-02  1:30                                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-01 13:39                       ` Christoph Rohland
2001-05-01 23:25                         ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-28 18:04                   ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-04-28 21:23                     ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-29  1:43                     ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-29  9:17                       ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-04-28 18:21                   ` David Lang
2001-04-28 21:25                     ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-30 18:14               ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-04 22:04 Matt_Domsch
2001-03-05  8:58 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-03-05 14:30   ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-05 14:36   ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-05 14:52   ` Matti Aarnio
2001-03-05 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-03-05 16:53 Andries.Brouwer
2001-04-30 18:45 Torrey Hoffman
2001-04-30 19:04 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-30 19:07   ` David S. Miller
2001-04-30 19:14     ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-30 21:04       ` Andreas Ferber
2001-05-02 14:31     ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-02 22:17       ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-04  8:16         ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-03 14:04 Ishikawa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200103031114.MAA13672@cave.bitwizard.nl \
    --to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
    --cc=fluffy@snurgle.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox