From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129106AbRCFNHe>; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:07:34 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S130647AbRCFNHY>; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:07:24 -0500
Received: from [63.193.79.18] ([63.193.79.18]:60150 "HELO mwg.inxservices.lan")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S129106AbRCFNHI>;
	Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:07:08 -0500
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 05:05:46 -0800
From: George Garvey <tmwg-linuxknl@inxservices.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.2ac12 (vt82c686 info)
Message-ID: <20010306050546.C948@inxservices.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Organization: inX Services, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> No, just the vt82c686. vt82c686a and vt82c686b are OK.

So can the vt82c686 be replaced with one of these other chips? What
action is available to owners of MBs with chips that don't work w/Linux?