* hotplug and interrupt context
@ 2001-03-12 0:48 Andreas Bombe
2001-03-12 3:18 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Bombe @ 2001-03-12 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I couldn't trace that down to be 100% sure and it's better to conform to
design than implementation, so I'll ask:
Do the probe and remove functions of a pci_driver have to be able to
work in interrupt context? (i.e. GFP_ATOMIC and stuff)
I expect so, since CardBus handling doesn't start a thread and would
call these functions from the context it got the insertion message
(interrupt context).
--
Andreas E. Bombe <andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de> DSA key 0x04880A44
http://home.pages.de/~andreas.bombe/ http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: hotplug and interrupt context
2001-03-12 0:48 hotplug and interrupt context Andreas Bombe
@ 2001-03-12 3:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-13 1:43 ` Andreas Bombe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2001-03-12 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Bombe; +Cc: linux-kernel
Andreas Bombe wrote:
>
> I couldn't trace that down to be 100% sure and it's better to conform to
> design than implementation, so I'll ask:
>
> Do the probe and remove functions of a pci_driver have to be able to
> work in interrupt context? (i.e. GFP_ATOMIC and stuff)
No, no interrupt context to worry about. It would really suck if you
couldn't sleep in pci_driver::probe :)
For CardBus, it calls schedule_task ..
--
Jeff Garzik | "You see, in this world there's two kinds of
Building 1024 | people, my friend: Those with loaded guns
MandrakeSoft | and those who dig. You dig." --Blondie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: hotplug and interrupt context
2001-03-12 3:18 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2001-03-13 1:43 ` Andreas Bombe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Bombe @ 2001-03-13 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andreas Bombe wrote:
> >
> > I couldn't trace that down to be 100% sure and it's better to conform to
> > design than implementation, so I'll ask:
> >
> > Do the probe and remove functions of a pci_driver have to be able to
> > work in interrupt context? (i.e. GFP_ATOMIC and stuff)
>
> No, no interrupt context to worry about. It would really suck if you
> couldn't sleep in pci_driver::probe :)
Very good. I wasn't sure since I saw GFP_ATOMIC allocations somewhere
in the cardbus code which looked like it was in card initialization.
But it's also confusing and somewhere was a note saying that some of
this is obsolete code which is replaced elsewhere...
> For CardBus, it calls schedule_task ..
Another thing learned, thanks.
--
Andreas E. Bombe <andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de> DSA key 0x04880A44
http://home.pages.de/~andreas.bombe/ http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-03-13 1:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-12 0:48 hotplug and interrupt context Andreas Bombe
2001-03-12 3:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-13 1:43 ` Andreas Bombe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox