public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@linuxcare.com.au>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: sys_sched_yield fast path
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:24:47 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010312122447.A7350@linuxcare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010312005448.A5439@linuxcare.com> <XFMail.20010312011030.davidel@xmailserver.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20010312011030.davidel@xmailserver.org>; from davidel@xmailserver.org on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:10:30AM +0100

 
Hi,

> 2.4.x has changed the scheduler behaviour so that the task that call
> sched_yield() is not rescheduled by the incoming schedule().  A flag is
> set ( under certain conditions in SMP ) and the goodness() calculation
> assign the lower value to the exiting task ( this flag is cleared in
> schedule_tail() ).

The behaviour I am talking about is when there is a heavily contended
spinlock, and more than one task is trying to obtain it. Since SCHED_YIELD
only changes the goodness when we are trying to reschedule the task we
can bounce between two or more tasks doing sched_yield() for a while before
finally running the task that has the spinlock.

Of course with short lived spinlocks you should rarely get the case where
a task grabs a spinlock just before its timeslice is up, so maybe the answer
is just to spin a few times on sched_yield() then back off to nanosleep()
like pthreads does.

Anton

      reply	other threads:[~2001-03-12  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-10  0:47 sys_sched_yield fast path Mike Kravetz
2001-03-10 11:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-10 16:59   ` Andi Kleen
2001-03-11 14:12     ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-11 13:54       ` Anton Blanchard
2001-03-11 19:17         ` Dave Zarzycki
2001-03-12  0:18           ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-11 23:46         ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-12  0:10         ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-12  1:24           ` Anton Blanchard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010312122447.A7350@linuxcare.com \
    --to=anton@linuxcare.com.au \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox