From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: rhw@MemAlpha.CX, kaboom@gatech.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
seberino@spawar.navy.mil
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improved version reporting
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:39:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010314233958.A6124@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200103141929.UAA178418.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>
In-Reply-To: <UTC200103141929.UAA178418.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl>; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:29:53PM +0100
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:29:53PM +0100, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> There is no other source. Some people like to repack but that
> has no influence on versions.
I believe that RedHat don't build mount and util-linux from the same tree.
Maybe they do internally, but when you look at the RPMs, they appear
separate:
Name: mount
Source RPM: mount-2.10m-6.src.rpm
Name: util-linux
Source RPM: util-linux-2.10m-12.src.rpm
There don't appear to be any explicit dependencies between these two
packages either, but they do just happen to have the same version.
(I'm looking at the RH7.0 RPMs here).
This of course means that the version of mount may not match the version
of util-linux installed on the system.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-14 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-14 19:29 [PATCH] Improved version reporting Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-14 23:39 ` Russell King [this message]
2001-03-16 10:54 ` Riley Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-17 10:20 Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-17 1:07 Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-17 17:17 ` Riley Williams
2001-03-16 12:45 Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-16 13:30 ` Nick Holloway
2001-03-16 23:28 ` Riley Williams
2001-03-15 9:52 Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-15 11:05 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-03-17 4:35 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-03-17 17:51 ` Riley Williams
2001-03-19 6:50 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-03-19 9:15 ` Riley Williams
2001-03-23 8:33 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-03-23 9:42 ` Riley Williams
2001-03-14 16:51 Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-14 16:01 Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-14 16:26 ` Alexander Viro
2001-03-15 4:12 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-03-14 16:36 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-03-14 17:28 ` Riley Williams
[not found] <11a40b11caeb.11caeb11a40b@nosc.mil>
2001-03-14 10:39 ` Riley Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010314233958.A6124@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=kaboom@gatech.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rhw@MemAlpha.CX \
--cc=seberino@spawar.navy.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox