public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Paul Gortmaker <p_gortmaker@yahoo.com>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	andre@linux-ide.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] off-by-1 error in ide-probe (2.4.x)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:35:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010318223558.L29105@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AB47DA4.795B609B@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <3AB47DA4.795B609B@yahoo.com>; from p_gortmaker@yahoo.com on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:19:32AM -0500

On Sun, Mar 18 2001, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> There is a potentially serious bug in ide-probe.c in which max_sectors
> is set to 256 instead of 255.  I am surprised that this hasn't bit anyone
> else yet.  Perhaps because you need a disk that is slow in comparison to 
> the host in order for the queue to climb up to and then hit the 256, at
> which point it then falls over.  

You don't need a slow disk, it's trivial to provoke 256 sector sized
request on even the fastest disk available. People hit it all the time,
just with working drives...

> For example, with an old 700MB Maxtor on a "fast" 486, VL-bus, PIO, 
> hdparm -c1 -m8 -u1, I could pretty much on demand generate the following 
> error by multiple builds, or by the final linking of any big project:

The 256 is _not_ a bug in the driver, it's more likely a bug in your
drive. 256 is a perfectly legal transfer size. That said, maybe it is
a good idea to leave it at 255 just for safety on drives not handling
0 sectors == 128kB transfer.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-18 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-18  9:19 [PATCH] off-by-1 error in ide-probe (2.4.x) Paul Gortmaker
2001-03-18 21:35 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2001-03-18 23:27   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-18 23:32     ` Andre Hedrick
2001-03-22  9:26   ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-03-22 13:32     ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-19  0:18 Andries.Brouwer
2001-03-19  1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-19  2:23   ` Andre Hedrick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010318223558.L29105@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p_gortmaker@yahoo.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox