From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: eli.carter@inet.com (Eli Carter)
Cc: lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk (Jamie Lokier), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday question
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:06:00 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200103191906.TAA01646@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AB64F4F.7518D3D5@inet.com> from "Eli Carter" at Mar 19, 2001 12:26:23 PM
Eli Carter writes:
> Russell, I know that at least the EBSA285's timer1_gettimeoffset() needs
> some attention to fix a time going backward problem.
I know about this, which is what started me looking at what x86 does,
and I am firmly of the conclusion that x86 is buggy as it stands.
I believe that we can, instead of having a per-machine fix on ARM, have
a generic fix. At the moment, I haven't worked out exactly what this
generic fix would be.
> The problem is only going to occur if gettimeoffset has not been called
> in the past 10ms. Once 10ms has passed, either jiffies has changed, or
> count will have passed count_p.
My concern with the x86 fix is what if 9.9999999999ms has passed since the
last timer tick, and we got the timer tick after we disabled interrupts and
entered do_gettimeofday. This can lead to the tests in there miscorrecting
IMHO. You won't see it with an infinite loop reading the time of day...
I'll re-read your mail in more depth later tonight. Appologies if this
reply appears to be a little early.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-19 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-03 12:49 gettimeofday question Russell King
2001-03-03 16:24 ` Russell King
2001-03-19 7:33 ` Russell King
2001-03-19 11:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-03-19 18:26 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 19:06 ` Russell King [this message]
2001-03-19 19:49 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 21:34 ` Russell King
2001-03-19 22:54 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 23:44 ` Russell King
2001-03-20 15:27 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 22:14 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 22:27 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 23:10 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 23:27 ` Question on binutils release to use Anthony Barbachan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200103191906.TAA01646@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=eli.carter@inet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox