public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: eli.carter@inet.com (Eli Carter)
Cc: lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk (Jamie Lokier), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday question
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:06:00 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200103191906.TAA01646@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AB64F4F.7518D3D5@inet.com> from "Eli Carter" at Mar 19, 2001 12:26:23 PM

Eli Carter writes:
> Russell, I know that at least the EBSA285's timer1_gettimeoffset() needs
> some attention to fix a time going backward problem. 

I know about this, which is what started me looking at what x86 does,
and I am firmly of the conclusion that x86 is buggy as it stands.

I believe that we can, instead of having a per-machine fix on ARM, have
a generic fix.  At the moment, I haven't worked out exactly what this
generic fix would be.

> The problem is only going to occur if gettimeoffset has not been called
> in the past 10ms.  Once 10ms has passed, either jiffies has changed, or
> count will have passed count_p.

My concern with the x86 fix is what if 9.9999999999ms has passed since the
last timer tick, and we got the timer tick after we disabled interrupts and
entered do_gettimeofday.  This can lead to the tests in there miscorrecting
IMHO.  You won't see it with an infinite loop reading the time of day...

I'll re-read your mail in more depth later tonight.  Appologies if this
reply appears to be a little early.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-19 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-03 12:49 gettimeofday question Russell King
2001-03-03 16:24 ` Russell King
2001-03-19  7:33 ` Russell King
2001-03-19 11:39   ` Jamie Lokier
2001-03-19 18:26     ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 19:06       ` Russell King [this message]
2001-03-19 19:49         ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 21:34           ` Russell King
2001-03-19 22:54             ` Eli Carter
2001-03-19 23:44               ` Russell King
2001-03-20 15:27                 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 22:14             ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 22:27               ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 23:10                 ` Eli Carter
2001-03-21 23:27               ` Question on binutils release to use Anthony Barbachan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200103191906.TAA01646@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=eli.carter@inet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox