From: Oleg Drokin <green@ixcelerator.com>
To: Manoj Sontakke <manojs@sasken.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: IP layer bug?
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:02:13 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010326110213.A17124@iXcelerator.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010326100941.A16800@iXcelerator.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103261739260.25784-100000@pcc65.sasi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103261739260.25784-100000@pcc65.sasi.com>; from manojs@sasken.com on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:51:43PM +0530
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:51:43PM +0530, Manoj Sontakke wrote:
> > > ip_options_compile() when called with first argument NULL resets cb to 0.
> > I have found that already.
> > > underlying layer(link and phy) could be anything so where from the
> > > ip_options should start will depend upon the underlying layer.
> > But here's the problem!
> > If I won't zero cb in my driver before netif_rx() call,
> > IP layer thinks that all my packets have various ip options set
> > (source routing most notable)
> U can set cb to zero, but u also plan to use cb for storing ur data. If
I use it for storing data, but when I do netif_rx() on skb, I cannot touch it
anymore, so no data there is belong to me, and if I read that code in
ip_input.c, it gets zeroed.
BTW, I found that it's not ip_input.c that sends me 'source routing rejected'
message, because no message is logged. It might be some other place.
But anyway something is wrong in IP layer.
> that happens then u need to modify the way the macro IPCB
> (probably in net/ip.h) is defined. Also make sure to increase the size
> of cb to accomodate ur data. This will solve ur problem but making this
My data perfectly fits in cb of current size.
> general (part of the standard kernel code) needs a lot of work in the ip
> layer. The cb is also used by TCP. The same needs to be done in IP layer
> but this will again largly depend on the layers below and hence the
> complexity.
But comment in skbuff.h claims that any owner of skb can use cb for its own needs, till it passes ownership to whoever else.
> The alternative to this is that u can add another buffer like cb in
> sk_buff.
What for?
Bye,
Oleg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-26 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-24 21:57 IP layer bug? Oleg Drokin
2001-03-26 10:36 ` Manoj Sontakke
2001-03-26 6:09 ` Oleg Drokin
2001-03-26 12:21 ` Manoj Sontakke
2001-03-26 7:02 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2001-03-30 17:13 ` kuznet
2001-03-31 15:03 ` Oleg Drokin
2001-03-31 15:32 ` kuznet
2001-04-02 9:25 ` Oleg Drokin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010326110213.A17124@iXcelerator.com \
--to=green@ixcelerator.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manojs@sasken.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox