From: "Jos� Luis Domingo L�pez" <jldomingo@crosswinds.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Plans for 2.5
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:37:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010329013741.A6451@dardhal.mired.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OJECKBFFEMDBJMBOKGEDKEEKCCAA.jisla@elogica.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <OJECKBFFEMDBJMBOKGEDKEEKCCAA.jisla@elogica.com.br>; from jisla@elogica.com.br on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:44:52PM -0300
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Size: 1658 bytes --]
On Wednesday, 28 March 2001, at 19:44:52 -0300,
Bruno Avila wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is
> planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already
> is stable or well done for nature, we could thing more on performance to be
> a diferencial over others. What do you people thing?
>
My two cents. I'd like to see Linux VM subsystem "stabilize". By now, with
2.4.x I have the subjective impression that memory management is a bit
worse that on 2.2.x. For example, the kernel starts allocating much swap
space even when there is still plenty of free physical RAM. Also, it tends
not to balance well between cached/buffered data and swap space. Finally,
when an application ends and releases memroy, swap space allocated by this
application _seems_ not to be freed (that, AFAIK, is a know issue being
addressed). Don't know if this is 2.5.x stuff or can be integrated into
later 2.4.x releases.
By the way, it has been mentioned in this list that work is underway to
develop new capability based features for the kernel. Does it have
anything to do with capabilities as provided by LIDS ?. Is there a plan on
integrating this and/or other patches in the mainstream kernel ?.
Argh, too many things at once, and the worst one is that I can't help a lot
on anyone. I expect not to have given developers a bit of extra work :)
--
José Luis Domingo López
Linux Registered User #189436 Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM)
jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org => ¿ Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias
jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-28 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-28 22:44 Plans for 2.5 Bruno Avila
2001-03-29 1:37 ` Jos� Luis Domingo L�pez [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-29 4:37 James Simmons
2001-03-29 9:10 Hen, Shmulik
2001-03-31 3:54 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-03-31 14:36 ` James Lewis Nance
2001-03-31 14:52 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
[not found] <fa.ngc0npv.1dmkhh4@ifi.uio.no>
2001-03-29 12:11 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010329013741.A6451@dardhal.mired.net \
--to=jldomingo@crosswinds.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox