From: "Quim K Holland" <qkholland@my-deja.com>
To: szabi@inf.elte.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] 2.4.x nice level
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 16:04:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200104022304.QAA19333@mail6.bigmailbox.com> (raw)
>>>>> "BS" == BERECZ Szabolcs <szabi@inf.elte.hu> writes:
BS> ... a setiathome running at nice level 19, and a bladeenc at
BS> nice level 0. setiathome uses 14 percent, and bladeenc uses
BS> 84 percent of the processor. I think, setiathome should use
BS> max 2-3 percent. the 14 percent is way too much for me.
BS> ...
BS> with kernel 2.2.16 it worked for me.
BS> now I use 2.4.2-ac20
Would it the case that bladeenc running on 2.4.2 spends more
time doing I/O? I am not saying that the userland makes more I/O
requests, but if the same set of I/O requests are taking longer
to complete on 2.4.2, then while bladeenc is waiting for their
completion, it is not so surprising that the other process uses
the otherwise-idle CPU cycles.
------------------------------------------------------------
--== Sent via Deja.com ==--
http://www.deja.com/
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-02 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-02 23:04 Quim K Holland [this message]
2001-04-03 3:02 ` [QUESTION] 2.4.x nice level LA Walsh
[not found] <fa.j9vo8pv.1rj8up9@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.dkui9av.1ulsbjm@ifi.uio.no>
2001-04-05 17:24 ` Tor Arntsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-04 16:12 SodaPop
2001-04-10 3:37 ` george anzinger
2001-04-10 16:10 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-10 16:39 ` george anzinger
2001-04-02 22:13 BERECZ Szabolcs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200104022304.QAA19333@mail6.bigmailbox.com \
--to=qkholland@my-deja.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=szabi@inf.elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox