From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, Mike Kravetz <mkravetz@sequent.com>,
Fabio Riccardi <fabio@chromium.com>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: a quest for a better scheduler
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:12:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010404171227.W20911@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFB30A8B18.2E3AD16C-ON85256A24.004BD696@pok.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFB30A8B18.2E3AD16C-ON85256A24.004BD696@pok.ibm.com>; from frankeh@us.ibm.com on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:10AM -0400
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:10AM -0400, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> I understand the dilemma that the Linux scheduler is in, namely satisfy
> the low end at all cost. [..]
We can satisfy the low end by making the numa scheduler at compile time (that's
what I did in my patch at least).
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-04 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-04 14:03 a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
2001-04-04 13:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-04 22:16 ` Tim Wright
2001-04-04 22:54 ` Christopher Smith
2001-04-05 22:38 ` Timothy D. Witham
2001-04-06 3:27 ` Christopher Smith
2001-04-06 18:06 ` Timothy D. Witham
2001-04-06 21:08 ` Michael Peddemors
2001-04-06 22:33 ` Nathan Straz
2001-04-04 15:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-04-04 15:49 ` Khalid Aziz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-18 14:50 Yoav Etsion
2001-04-06 13:15 Hubertus Franke
2001-04-05 23:53 Torrey Hoffman
2001-04-05 23:01 Hubertus Franke
2001-04-04 19:06 Hubertus Franke
2001-04-04 17:17 Hubertus Franke
2001-04-04 15:36 Hubertus Franke
2001-04-04 15:28 Hubertus Franke
2001-04-04 13:43 Hubertus Franke
2001-04-04 13:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-04 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-04 15:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-04 15:44 ` Khalid Aziz
2001-04-04 6:36 alad
2001-04-03 2:23 Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-03 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-03 19:13 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-04-03 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-03 22:43 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-04-04 0:18 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-04 2:47 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-04-04 4:21 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-04 17:27 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-04-04 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-04 16:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-04-04 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-03 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-04 0:33 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-04 0:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-04 1:17 ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-04 1:50 ` Christopher Smith
2001-04-04 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-04-04 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010404171227.W20911@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=fabio@chromium.com \
--cc=frankeh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mkravetz@sequent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox