From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bert@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl,
jeanpaul@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl
Subject: P-III Oddity.
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 21:33:18 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200104071933.VAA19651@cave.bitwizard.nl> (raw)
Hi,
One machine regularly crashes.
Linux version 2.2.16-3 (root@porky.devel.redhat.com) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #1 Mon Jun 19 19:11:44 EDT 2000
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 7
model name : Pentium III (Katmai)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 551.255
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
sep_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr xmm
bogomips : 1101.00
Another one, I don't really know, but I was comparing /proc/cpuinfo on
these two machines as they are supposed to have the same CPU:
/home/wolff> cat /proc/version /proc/cpuinfo
Linux version 2.4.3 (wolff@cave) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #52 Fri Apr 6 14:43:38 MEST 2001
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 7
model name : Pentium III (Katmai)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 551.263
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 3
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips : 1101.00
/home/wolff>
Everything is exactly the same, except for the "cpuid level". Once the
cpu family and model are the same, I'd expect the cpuid level to be
the same too. In this case even the stepping is the same, so how can
the cpuid level differ?
Maybe this is a reporting difference between 2.4.3 and 2.2.16????
Anybody care to shed some light on this?
Roger.
--
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots.
* There are also old, bald pilots.
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-07 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-07 19:33 Rogier Wolff [this message]
2001-04-07 19:56 ` P-III Oddity Dave Jones
2001-04-08 1:05 ` CaT
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-07 20:00 Manfred Spraul
2001-04-07 23:56 Trevor Hemsley
2001-04-08 1:48 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200104071933.VAA19651@cave.bitwizard.nl \
--to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
--cc=bert@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl \
--cc=jeanpaul@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox