From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff)
To: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
Cc: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp,
Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: goodbye
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 15:56:25 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200104081356.PAA24042@cave.bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010408132205.O805@mea-ext.zmailer.org> from Matti Aarnio at "Apr 8, 2001 01:22:05 pm"
Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 02:10:52PM +0900, kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp wrote:
> > How about creating an additional ML,
> > the new ML (say LKML-DUL) is used to send mails from DUL to LKML, but
> > such mails are not sent to LMKL.
>
> Layering and technology problem.
>
> SMTP receiver does those RBL/DUL/ORBS analysis, and its policy
> control does not know where exactly the email is heading into
> (that is, the reception policy is system level, not by recipients.)
Then fix it!
SMTP receivers should have the option of inserting a header line
instead of blocking "bad" Emails. Then other layers can decide what to
do with this Email.
I really would like to run "ORBS" on my incoming-mail-server. However
I find it unacceptable to be rejecting Email from possibly legitimate
clients. So Adding an "relay is listed on orbs" line would allow me to
sort this into a low priority "probably spam" mailbox, just like I'd
do with those tagged as such by LKML.
After adding the header line, you could easily make majordomo do
special stuff with this Email, but having the header line probably
makes that unneccesary.
If you're willing to pay a small amount to make this happen, or if
you're willing to earn a few bucks by implementing this, stop by:
http://www.cosource.com/cgi-bin/cos.pl/wish/info/402
and http://www.cosource.com/cgi-bin/cos.pl/wish/info/403
Roger.
--
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots.
* There are also old, bald pilots.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-08 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-03 21:01 goodbye Rik van Riel
2001-04-04 1:14 ` goodbye Michael Peddemors
2001-04-07 23:32 ` goodbye Matti Aarnio
2001-04-08 4:09 ` goodbye Ralf Baechle
2001-04-08 4:17 ` goodbye David Fries
2001-04-12 21:31 ` goodbye Mike Fedyk
2001-04-08 5:10 ` goodbye kumon
[not found] ` <20010408011915.A14899@whitestar.soark.net>
2001-04-08 5:31 ` goodbye kumon
2001-04-08 10:22 ` goodbye Matti Aarnio
2001-04-08 11:50 ` goodbye kumon
2001-04-08 13:56 ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
2001-04-08 18:00 ` goodbye Davide Libenzi
2001-04-08 22:10 ` goodbye David Woodhouse
2001-04-09 19:12 ` goodbye Alan Cox
2001-04-09 19:36 ` goodbye Rogier Wolff
2001-04-08 5:58 ` goodbye Graham Murray
2001-04-08 6:19 ` goodbye Aaron Lehmann
2001-04-08 10:58 ` goodbye Olaf Titz
2001-04-09 4:33 ` goodbye Rik van Riel
2001-04-09 4:51 ` goodbye David S. Miller
2001-04-09 5:50 ` goodbye Rik van Riel
2001-04-09 6:47 ` goodbye Richard Gooch
2001-04-09 12:58 ` goodbye Billy Harvey
2001-04-09 17:58 ` goodbye || alternatives David
2001-04-09 22:00 ` goodbye Matti Aarnio
2001-04-09 22:00 ` goodbye Rik van Riel
2001-04-09 23:40 ` goodbye Joseph Carter
2001-04-10 0:46 ` goodbye Rik van Riel
2001-04-09 19:30 ` goodbye Alan Cox
2001-04-09 19:20 ` [OT] goodbye Michael Peddemors
2001-04-09 21:34 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-04-09 22:23 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-09 22:58 ` David
[not found] ` <9ao861$f1$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-04-08 2:07 ` goodbye Colonel
2001-04-08 2:56 ` goodbye john slee
2001-04-08 4:02 ` goodbye Joseph Carter
2001-04-08 13:22 ` goodbye Jeff Mcadams
2001-04-08 13:22 ` goodbye David Woodhouse
2001-04-08 15:41 ` goodbye Joseph Carter
2001-04-08 4:46 ` goodbye Stephen Satchell
2001-04-08 13:26 ` goodbye Rogier Wolff
2001-04-08 19:15 ` goodbye Ben Ford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-03 21:56 Goodbye Matthew Fredrickson
2001-04-03 22:21 ` Goodbye Ion Badulescu
2001-04-09 14:22 goodbye Wayne.Brown
2001-04-09 14:28 ` goodbye David Woodhouse
2001-04-09 17:57 ` goodbye Stephen E. Clark
2001-04-09 15:12 goodbye Wayne.Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200104081356.PAA24042@cave.bitwizard.nl \
--to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
--cc=kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=michael@linuxmagic.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox