From: "Eugene B. Berdnikov" <berd@elf.ihep.su>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bug report: tcp staled when send-q != 0, timers == 0.
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:28:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010411232836.C19364@elf.ihep.su> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010411223536.A19364@elf.ihep.su> <200104111904.XAA10804@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200104111904.XAA10804@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:04:04PM +0400
Hello.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:04:04PM +0400, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> > In my experiments linux simply sets mss=mtu-40 at the start of ethernet
> > connections. I do not know why, but belive it's ok. How the version of
> > kernel and configuration options can affect mss later?
[...]
> The problem begins f.e. when mss is less and packet arrives on ethernet.
> It eats the same 1.5k of memory, but carries only ~mss bytes of tcp payload.
> See? We do not know this forward, advertise large window, have not enough
> rcvbuf to get it filled and cannot do anything but dropping new packets.
However, I can't understand the dependency upon the kernel version, etc...
Let me steak on this question again. In my experiments I found the
dependency on the keepalive setting for connection on 2.2.17:
mtu 382 + keepalive yes -> loss
mtu 382 + keepalive no -> ok
I made 2 tries for each setting. Does your model of "mss/mtu bug" cover
such a picture? If the answer is "yes", I am almost satisfied. :-)
If this behaviour is not deterministic, and is driven by probability,
does it mean that I can get other results with large number of tests?
--
Eugene Berdnikov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-11 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-09 14:43 Bug report: tcp staled when send-q != 0, timers == 0 Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-10 17:38 ` kuznet
2001-04-10 21:19 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 10:16 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 16:56 ` kuznet
2001-04-11 18:35 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 19:04 ` kuznet
2001-04-11 19:28 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov [this message]
2001-04-11 19:37 ` kuznet
2001-04-11 16:35 ` kuznet
2001-04-11 18:50 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 19:09 ` kuznet
2001-04-11 19:18 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-13 8:54 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
[not found] ` <200104181928.XAA04912@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
2001-04-21 15:45 ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-21 17:02 ` kuznet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010411232836.C19364@elf.ihep.su \
--to=berd@elf.ihep.su \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox