public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maneesh Soni <smaneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: tridge@samba.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lse tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Scalable FD Management using Read-Copy-Update
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:13:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010412211354.A25905@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010409201311.D9013@in.ibm.com> <20010411182929.A16665@va.samba.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010411182929.A16665@va.samba.org>; from anton@samba.org on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 06:29:30PM -0700

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 06:29:30PM -0700, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> 
> > This patch provides a very good performance improvement in file 
> > descriptor management for SMP linux kernel on a 4-way machine with the 
> > expectation of even higher gains on higher end machines. The patch uses the 
> > read-copy-update mechanism for Linux, published earlier at the sourceforge
> > site under Linux Scalablity Effort project.
> >        http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rclock.html.
> 
> Good stuff!
> 
> It would be interesting to try a filesystem benchmark such as dbench. On
> a quad PPC fget was chewing up more than its fair share of cpu time.
> 
> Anton

Hello Anton,

Thank you for your suggestion. I tried dbench for on a 4-way PIII Xeon box, with
1MB L2 Cache and 1GB of RAM. I ran it on 8 GB ext2 partition with Adaptec 7896 
SCSI controller. I ran "dbench 100" and "dbench 200" for five times and took the
average of the throughput and found that for 

Base (2.4.2) - 
        100 Average Throughput = 39.628  MB/sec
        200 Average Throughput = 22.792  MB/sec

Base + files_struct patch - 
        100 Average Throughput = 39.874 MB/sec
        200 Average Throughput = 23.174 MB/sec  
         
I found this value quite less than the one present in the README distributed
with dbench tarball. I think the numbers in the README were for a similar 
machine but with 2.2.9 kernel.

As you can see the performance with files_struct patch is almost same as base. 
I feel I am hitting some bottleneck other than fget() in both base and the 
patched versions. I think atleast for base version I should get similar numbers
as mentions in the README for similar configuration. Though I intend to do some 
profiling to look into this but it will be helpfull if you can tell me if there 
is some known thing regarding this.

I am copying this to Andrew also, if he can also help. Also if you have some
dbench numbers from 2.4.x kernel, please let me have a look into those also.

Thank you,
Maneesh


-- 
Maneesh Soni <smaneesh@in.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-12 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-09 14:43 [RFC][PATCH] Scalable FD Management using Read-Copy-Update Maneesh Soni
2001-04-12  1:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-04-12 15:43   ` Maneesh Soni [this message]
2001-04-12 15:51     ` [Lse-tech] " Anton Blanchard
2001-04-17 10:49       ` Scalable FD Management Maneesh Soni
2001-04-17 14:36         ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-12 18:23     ` [Lse-tech] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Scalable FD Management using Read-Copy-Update John Hawkes
2001-04-16 16:16 ` Mark Hahn
2001-04-17  9:28   ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-04-17 16:59     ` Mark Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010412211354.A25905@in.ibm.com \
    --to=smaneesh@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tridge@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox