From: "Jakob Østergaard" <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Andreas Peter <ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SW-RAID0 Performance problems
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:01:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010413180152.A13740@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01041313473002.00533@debian>
In-Reply-To: <01041313473002.00533@debian>; from ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:47:30PM +0200
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Andreas Peter wrote:
> Hi,
> I've successfully set up SW-RAID0 with Kernel 2.4.3 and Raidtools 0.9.
> I did this to increase the performance of my HD, but nothig happens.
> The hdparm results:
> hdparm -t /dev/md0 : 20.25 MB/sec
> hdparm -t /dev/hda : 20.51 MB/sec
> hdaprm -t /dev/hdc : 20.71 MB/sec
>
> I thougt the performnace of RAID0 should near 40MB/sec.
> I played with different chunk-sizes, but the result was everytime the same.
> The drives are both Maxtor DiamondMax VL40, 30GB, DMA on.
> No other drive is attached on the bus.
>
> Here are also some bonnie++ results:
...
I can't say much about this... It looks like your setup is perfectly allright,
and the performance *should* go up. Instead it looks like you get a small
performance drop from using the RAID. Most odd.
Do you have more controllers in the machine ? If so could you try to move eg.
hdc to the second controller ? The only thing I can imagine being the cause of
the poor performance is, if your controller somehow doesn't handle both
channels very well simultaneously. It's far fetched, but it's the only
suggestion I can think of.
Maybe Andre has comments ?
I usually get a good speedup from using RAID-0 on 2.4.3 with IDE. Both with
two disks and with six. This is with Intel PIIX4 and Promise 20262
controllers.
--
................................................................
: jakob@unthought.net : And I see the elder races, :
:.........................: putrid forms of man :
: Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
: OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-13 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-13 11:47 SW-RAID0 Performance problems Andreas Peter
2001-04-13 16:01 ` Jakob Østergaard [this message]
2001-04-13 16:28 ` Andreas Peter
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104131048550.1669-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-04-13 15:36 ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-13 16:07 ` David Rees
2001-04-13 16:28 ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-14 7:04 ` David Rees
2001-04-14 9:38 ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-14 12:28 ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-04-14 13:09 ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-13 18:11 ` Tim Moore
2001-04-14 10:45 ` Andreas Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010413180152.A13740@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox