From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: usb-uhci.c problems in latest kernels?
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 04:29:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010416042947.B16720@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010414213546.A1590@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20010415043836.C15118@debian.org> <20010415232909.A28478@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010415232909.A28478@devserv.devel.redhat.com>; from zaitcev@redhat.com on Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 11:29:09PM -0400
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 11:29:09PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > I'm not sure of that. Sometimes keys get "stuck" in the down position
> > with my USB keyboard (mechanical switches, so the keys themselves are not
> > sticking) and usually when that happens I can find a line like the one
> > quoted above in the logs. [...]
>
> The printout is a valuable diagnostic tool for hacking but
> is useless for a user (actually dangerous, as it brings computers
> down with /var overflow). The best option would be to have
> it configurable with a module parameter.
That sounds like a good idea actually, under kernel hacking perhaps? It
seems to me that the messages do indicate some kind of non-fatal problem
(that may not be true?) but I agree it is murderous to /var on a small
system. Given that I now consider a small system one with a /var of under
300 megs, well.. =)
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Free software developer
Techical solutions are not a matter of voting. Two legislations in the US
states almost decided that the value of Pi be 3.14, exactly. Popular vote
does not make for a correct solution.
-- Manoj Srivastava
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-16 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-15 1:35 usb-uhci.c problems in latest kernels? Pete Zaitcev
2001-04-15 11:38 ` Joseph Carter
2001-04-16 3:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-04-16 11:29 ` Joseph Carter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-13 20:06 Nicholas Petreley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010416042947.B16720@debian.org \
--to=knghtbrd@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox