From: Francois Romieu <romieu@cogenit.fr>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas@backlot.linas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck, raid reconstruction & bad bad 2.4.3 + some numbers
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:16:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010416161649.A19273@se1.cogenit.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010415181825.40FBB1BA03@backlot.linas.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010415181825.40FBB1BA03@backlot.linas.org>; from linas@backlot.linas.org on Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:18:25PM -0500
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit, Size: 1063 bytes --]
Linas Vepstas <linas@backlot.linas.org> écrit :
[...]
> I want to report a trio of raid-related problems. The third one is
> very serious, and effectively prevents 2.4.3 from being usable (by me).
>
[...]
> The problem: this dramatically slows fsck after an unclean shut-down.
> You can hear the drives machine-gunning. I haven't stop-watch timed it,
> but its on the order of 5x slower to fsck a raid partition when there's
> reconstruction going on, then when the raid thinks its clean. This
> makes unclean reboots quite painful.
Here 2.4.3 takes 15-20 minutes to fsck a 45 Go RAID1 fs after an
unclean shutdown (init=/bin/sh + raid1 autodetect = *boom*). The whole
reconstruction takes an hour (but system is in use).
The disks are IBM-DTLA-307045 on two differents ports of a PIIX4.
The machines includes two 9Go on a 53c875 that perform equally well
(tough a bit noisy during normal startup).
[2.4.3 experience]
> Whatever it is that changed in 2.4.3, it makes unclean reboots
> impossible ...
What does the swap says during the fsck ?
--
Ueimor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-16 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-15 18:18 fsck, raid reconstruction & bad bad 2.4.3 Linas Vepstas
[not found] ` <9bcoph$1vj$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-04-15 19:59 ` Colonel
2001-04-16 1:14 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2001-04-16 2:23 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-04-16 2:38 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-16 2:51 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-04-16 19:06 ` Jakob Østergaard
2001-04-16 4:03 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2001-04-16 14:16 ` Francois Romieu [this message]
2001-04-17 11:53 ` Ookhoi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010416161649.A19273@se1.cogenit.fr \
--to=romieu@cogenit.fr \
--cc=linas@backlot.linas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox