public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@cogenit.fr>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas@backlot.linas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck, raid reconstruction & bad bad 2.4.3 + some numbers
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:16:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010416161649.A19273@se1.cogenit.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010415181825.40FBB1BA03@backlot.linas.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010415181825.40FBB1BA03@backlot.linas.org>; from linas@backlot.linas.org on Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:18:25PM -0500

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit, Size: 1063 bytes --]

Linas Vepstas <linas@backlot.linas.org> écrit :
[...]
> I want to report a trio of raid-related problems.  The third one is 
> very serious, and effectively prevents 2.4.3 from being usable (by me).
> 
[...]
> The problem:  this dramatically slows fsck after an unclean shut-down.
> You can hear the drives machine-gunning.  I haven't stop-watch timed it,
> but its on the order of 5x slower to fsck a raid partition when there's
> reconstruction going on, then when the raid thinks its clean.  This
> makes unclean reboots quite painful.

Here 2.4.3 takes 15-20 minutes to fsck a 45 Go RAID1 fs after an
unclean shutdown (init=/bin/sh + raid1 autodetect = *boom*). The whole
reconstruction takes an hour (but system is in use).
The disks are IBM-DTLA-307045 on two differents ports of a PIIX4.
The machines includes two 9Go on a 53c875 that perform equally well
(tough a bit noisy during normal startup).

[2.4.3 experience]
> Whatever it is that changed in 2.4.3, it makes unclean reboots
> impossible ...

What does the swap says during the fsck ?

-- 
Ueimor

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-16 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-15 18:18 fsck, raid reconstruction & bad bad 2.4.3 Linas Vepstas
     [not found] ` <9bcoph$1vj$1@ns1.clouddancer.com>
2001-04-15 19:59   ` Colonel
2001-04-16  1:14     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2001-04-16  2:23       ` Jesse Pollard
2001-04-16  2:38         ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-16  2:51           ` Jesse Pollard
2001-04-16 19:06             ` Jakob Østergaard
2001-04-16  4:03         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2001-04-16 14:16 ` Francois Romieu [this message]
2001-04-17 11:53 ` Ookhoi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010416161649.A19273@se1.cogenit.fr \
    --to=romieu@cogenit.fr \
    --cc=linas@backlot.linas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox