From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: block devices don't work without plugging in 2.4.3
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:03:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010417190359.B523@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200104171640.f3HGeRb32326@oboe.it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <200104171640.f3HGeRb32326@oboe.it.uc3m.es>; from ptb@it.uc3m.es on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:40:27PM +0200
On Tue, Apr 17 2001, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> Well, anyway, as far as I can tell, the following has been lost from
> __make_request() in ll_rw_blk.c since the 2.4.0 days:
>
> out:
> - if (!q->plugged)
> - (q->request_fn)(q);
> if (freereq)
>
> The result appears to be that if a block device has called
> blk_queue_pluggable() to register a no-op plug_fn, then
> q->plugged will never be set (it's the duty of the plug_fn),
> and the devices registered request function wil never be called.
>
> This behaviour is distinct from 2.4.0, where registering a
> no-op made things work fine.
>
> Is the policy now supposed to be that we do some more work
> in the "no-op"? What am I supposed to do if I don't want
> plugging(1)(2)?
>
> (1) goes away and looks ....
> (2) actually, I do want plugging, but I like to keep the
> no-plug option around so that I can benchmark the difference
> and also provide a very conservative option setting.
Not using plugging is dead, blk_queue_pluggable has been killed in the
current 2.4.4-pre tree.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-17 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-17 16:40 block devices don't work without plugging in 2.4.3 Peter T. Breuer
2001-04-17 17:03 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-19 10:39 Peter T. Breuer
2001-04-19 10:51 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 11:23 ` Peter T. Breuer
2001-04-19 11:54 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 12:33 ` Peter T. Breuer
2001-04-19 12:40 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 13:09 ` Peter T. Breuer
2001-04-19 13:24 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 13:54 ` Peter T. Breuer
2001-04-19 13:59 ` Jens Axboe
2001-04-19 14:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010417190359.B523@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox