From: Jan Kasprzak <kas@informatics.muni.cz>
To: Wolfgang Rohdewald <WRohdewald@dplanet.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfile()
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010418080946.E2167@informatics.muni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010417170206.C2589096@informatics.muni.cz> <20010417161036.A21620@bastard.inflicted.net> <20010417223636.C2167@informatics.muni.cz> <20010417212249.D0552C24B@poboxes.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010417212249.D0552C24B@poboxes.com>; from WRohdewald@dplanet.ch on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:22:47PM +0200
Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
: On Tuesday 17 April 2001 22:36, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: > + if (len == -1 || len > 0 && len < count) {
:
: are you sure there are no missing () ?
:
: if ((len == -1) || (len > 0) && (len < count)) {
:
: assumig that && has precedence over || (I believe so)
Yes, but the precedence of ==, <, and > is even higher.
However, I've found a problem with the previous patch: The first chunk should
read:
- if((len = sendfile(session.d->outf->fd, retr_fd, offset, count)) == -1) {
+ len = sendfile(session.d->outf->fd, retr_fd, offset, count);
+ if (len == -1 || len > 0 && len < count) {
+ if (len != -1)
+ errno = EINTR;
i.e. we should not overwrite errno, when it is valid.
-Yenya
PS.: You can find the C operators precedence for example at
http://www.howstuffworks.com/c14.htm (found by Google).
--
\ Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at fi.muni.cz> http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/
\\ PGP: finger kas at aisa.fi.muni.cz 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E //
\\\ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ ///
Mantra: "everything is a stream of bytes". Repeat until enlightened. --Linus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-18 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-17 13:10 Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfile() Jan Kasprzak
2001-04-17 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-17 15:50 ` Jan Kasprzak
[not found] ` <20010417175916.A11824@gruyere.muc.suse.de>
2001-04-17 17:07 ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-04-17 17:40 ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-04-17 14:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-17 15:02 ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-04-17 16:04 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-17 16:15 ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-04-17 18:24 ` Pekka Pietikainen
2001-04-17 20:10 ` Jesse S Sipprell
2001-04-17 20:23 ` David S. Miller
2001-04-17 20:44 ` Jesse S Sipprell
2001-04-17 20:50 ` David S. Miller
2001-04-17 20:36 ` Jan Kasprzak
2001-04-17 21:22 ` Wolfgang Rohdewald
2001-04-17 21:43 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-04-18 6:09 ` Jan Kasprzak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010418080946.E2167@informatics.muni.cz \
--to=kas@informatics.muni.cz \
--cc=WRohdewald@dplanet.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox