* Rage Mobility P/M
@ 2001-04-18 18:17 Jani Monoses
2001-04-18 18:34 ` Ben Pfaff
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jani Monoses @ 2001-04-18 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi
does the atyfb or aty128fb support this chip?
Device id of 4c4d.
Using 2.4.3-ac7.
Thanks
Jani.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Rage Mobility P/M
2001-04-18 18:17 Rage Mobility P/M Jani Monoses
@ 2001-04-18 18:34 ` Ben Pfaff
2001-04-18 18:38 ` Jani Monoses
2001-04-19 6:40 ` Craig Schlenter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Pfaff @ 2001-04-18 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Monoses; +Cc: linux-kernel
Jani Monoses <jani@virtualro.ic.ro> writes:
> does the atyfb or aty128fb support this chip?
> Device id of 4c4d.
> Using 2.4.3-ac7.
I have a Rage Mobility with the same device ID on my laptop
(Compaq Armada M700) but haven't been able to get it working with
framebuffer. At any rate, atyfb is the proper one to use. Let
me know if you get it working, I'd like to use it too.
--
"How could this be a problem in a country
where we have Intel and Microsoft?"
--Al Gore on Y2K
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Rage Mobility P/M
2001-04-18 18:34 ` Ben Pfaff
@ 2001-04-18 18:38 ` Jani Monoses
2001-04-19 6:40 ` Craig Schlenter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jani Monoses @ 2001-04-18 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Pfaff; +Cc: linux-kernel
Well I only use it with vesafb,but ywrap is doing strange stuff
(maybe the card misreports the amount of memory on it) and redraw
and ypan are sloooow...
On 18 Apr 2001, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Jani Monoses <jani@virtualro.ic.ro> writes:
>
> > does the atyfb or aty128fb support this chip?
> > Device id of 4c4d.
> > Using 2.4.3-ac7.
>
> I have a Rage Mobility with the same device ID on my laptop
> (Compaq Armada M700) but haven't been able to get it working with
> framebuffer. At any rate, atyfb is the proper one to use. Let
> me know if you get it working, I'd like to use it too.
> --
> "How could this be a problem in a country
> where we have Intel and Microsoft?"
> --Al Gore on Y2K
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Rage Mobility P/M
2001-04-18 18:34 ` Ben Pfaff
2001-04-18 18:38 ` Jani Monoses
@ 2001-04-19 6:40 ` Craig Schlenter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Craig Schlenter @ 2001-04-19 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Pfaff; +Cc: Jani Monoses, linux-kernel
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:34:05PM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Jani Monoses <jani@virtualro.ic.ro> writes:
>
> > does the atyfb or aty128fb support this chip?
> > Device id of 4c4d.
> > Using 2.4.3-ac7.
>
> I have a Rage Mobility with the same device ID on my laptop
> (Compaq Armada M700) but haven't been able to get it working with
> framebuffer. At any rate, atyfb is the proper one to use. Let
> me know if you get it working, I'd like to use it too.
Tried a late model ac kernel and 2.4.4pre3. The ac kernel seems to
have a somewhat re-organised atyfb driver. Both fail dismally - I
see 'flashes' on the screen when typing stuff but the screen is
essentially blank. vesafb worked for the minute or two during which
I tested it but I couldn't get x running on top of the framebuffer
so I've gone back to normal vga console stuff and using a ati X
driver. Interestingly, the atyfb driver reported my card as 'PCI'
instead of AGP. Device ID is 4c4d. Machine is a Dell latitude CPt S600Gt.
I'd be keen to hear if anyone gets it working ...
--Craig
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-19 6:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-18 18:17 Rage Mobility P/M Jani Monoses
2001-04-18 18:34 ` Ben Pfaff
2001-04-18 18:38 ` Jani Monoses
2001-04-19 6:40 ` Craig Schlenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox