From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI power management
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:43:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010419134333.31606@mailhost.mipsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E14qEYX-0007Cl-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E14qEYX-0007Cl-00@the-village.bc.nu>
>null = 'do absolutely nothing'
>generic = 'do D3 as per the specification'
>
>The idea being the PM layer would go around calling
>
> dev->power_off(dev);
>
>as a default notifier for PCI devices.
Ok, I see. I didn't understand that the functions you were talking about
would be defaults to put directly in the pci_dev structure.
>And in the case of the cards like that you would need a custom mask. So you'd
>do
> pci_set_power_handler(dev, atyfb_power_on, atyfb_power_off)
>
>to get a custom function. For most authors however they can call the power
>handler setup just using prerolled functions that do the right thing and know
>about any architecture horrors they dont.
Right. However, rare are the drivers that don't need at least to know
that a power management sequence is going on. All bus mastering drivers,
at least, must stop bus mastering (and clearing the bit in the command
register is not enough on a bunch of them). Most drivers have to cleanly
stop ongoing operations, refuse (or block) requests while the driver is
sleeping, etc... and finally configure things back once waking up. I
don't see much cases where a simple "default" function would work.
My current scheme on powerbook don't do half of that... it still sorta
works since I manage to stop all scheduling and shut things down in the
proper order, but it's neither a clean nor a safe way to do things.
>I'd rather
>
> pci_dev->powerstate
>
>or similar as a set of flags in the device.
Ok, agree with that one.
I sill consider, however, that the current suspend/resume callbacks in
the pci_dev structure are not the best way to do things. I would have
really prefered that each pci_dev embed a pm notifier structure. In some
cases, we want to pass more than simple suspend/resume messages (suspend
request, suspend now, suspend cancel, and resume are the 4 messages I use
on powerbooks).
Also, this can be generalized to other type of drivers (USB, IEEE1394,
..), eventually passing bus-specific messages
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-19 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104181150530.7690-100000@nobelium.transmeta.com>
2001-04-19 8:25 ` PCI power management Jeff Garzik
2001-04-19 10:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-19 10:38 ` CaT
2001-04-19 12:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-19 12:57 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 13:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-19 13:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 13:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2001-04-20 0:05 ` Patrick Mochel
2001-04-20 12:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-20 12:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 12:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-21 9:09 ` Russell King
2001-04-19 10:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-04-19 13:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 0:11 ` [Linux-pm-devel] " Patrick Mochel
2001-04-19 23:03 ` Patrick Mochel
2004-08-02 21:33 pci " Erik Rigtorp
2004-08-02 23:45 ` Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010419134333.31606@mailhost.mipsys.com \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox