Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?

David Woodhouse
2001-04-21T12:37:27Z

esr@thyrsus.com said:
> If it can't be mechanically verified that the symbol has a correct
> reference pattern within the tree, then it's broken. That's a
> definition.

Here's an alternative definition:

If the symbol has the letters 'F', 'I', 'S' and 'H' in it, in any order,
then it's broken.

That's also a definition. It's not a particularly useful one, but neither
was yours.

/me looks for a way to equate the original definition with the halting
problem :)

--
dwmw2