From: Francois Romieu <romieu@cogenit.fr>
To: stefan@jaschke-net.de
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@cogenit.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: epic100 error
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 18:45:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010420184505.F32759@se1.cogenit.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010417184552.A6727@core.devicen.de> <01042016050400.01202@antares> <20010420163343.B4702@se1.cogenit.fr> <01042017575400.01716@antares>
In-Reply-To: <01042017575400.01716@antares>; from s-jaschke@t-online.de on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:57:54PM +0200
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit, Size: 3161 bytes --]
Stefan Jaschke <s-jaschke@t-online.de> écrit :
> On Friday 20 April 2001 16:33, Francois Romieu wrote:
> > Stefan Jaschke <s-jaschke@t-online.de> ecrit :
> > > I copied epic100.c from 2.4.2 into the 2.4.4-pre4 tree and it compiles
> > > and works without problems.
> > > This gives me a workable solution :-)
> >
> > Thanks for the info.
> > Now, why do you get so much Receive Queue Empty indications...
>
> Now, this is a question for more knowledgable persons than me :-)
I don't claim to be but it's quite amazing: in your logs,
the driver receives one packet and after that it go into a loop because
the adapter complains of the lack of available rx descriptors.
[Initialization of the card...32 rx descriptors are available for the card]
Apr 20 12:48:45 antares kernel: In epic_rx(), entry 0 00601021.
Apr 20 12:48:45 antares kernel: epic_rx() status was 00601021.
Apr 20 12:48:45 antares kernel: eth0: Interrupt, status=0x00240000 new
intstat=0x00240000.
Apr 20 12:48:45 antares kernel: eth0: exiting interrupt, intr_status=0x240000.
Incoming packet. 31 rx descriptors are available for the card.
Apr 20 12:48:46 antares kernel: eth0: Interrupt, status=0x008d0004 new
intstat=0x008c0000.
That shouldn't happen (RxFull in the code: the adapter sees a descriptor
owned by the CPU). The driver says to the card "Look again at the
descriptor" but alas it didn't do anything (coz this shouldn't happen here).
Apr 20 12:48:46 antares last message repeated 32 times
The adapter answer immediatly, kicks the same IRQ. The driver notices it
while it still is in epic_interrupt and after 32 try:
Apr 20 12:48:46 antares kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt,
IntrStatus=0x008d0004.
I assume nothing is overclocked or whatever
Could you try this patch (more output during the loop):
--- epic100.c.orig Fri Apr 20 11:54:57 2001
+++ epic100.c Fri Apr 20 17:55:25 2001
@@ -1083,8 +1083,19 @@
if (status & RxOverflow) { /* Missed a Rx frame. */
ep->stats.rx_errors++;
}
- if (status & (RxOverflow | RxFull))
+ if (status & RxOverflow)
outw(RxQueued, ioaddr + COMMAND);
+ if (status & RxFull) {
+ int i = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
+ if((ep->rx_ring[i].rxstatus &
+ cpu_to_le32(DescOwn)) != 0) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: desc %2.2d owned by card\n", dev->name, i);
+ }
+ }
+ outw(RxQueued, ioaddr + COMMAND);
+ }
if (status & PCIBusErr170) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: PCI Bus Error! EPIC status %4.4x.\n",
dev->name, status);
> Another question I have is about the different driver versions that
> are around.
> Till Harbaum <harbaum@telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de> just sent
> me a driver which is directly from SMC:
[...]
> and "copying" is the GPL. It seems to be a not yet released extension of the
> driver
> available from http://www.smc.de/sites/support/download/PCI/9432/LINUX/src9432lu.zip.
> Some changelog reads " 03/13/2001 Ling Yue for linux kernel 2.4".
>
> Is there communication between SMC and your group?
This is a question for more knowledgable persons than me (TM).
So far, the headers don't look terribly GPLish.
--
Ueimor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-20 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-17 16:45 epic100 error Oliver Teuber
2001-04-17 20:34 ` Stefan Jaschke
[not found] ` <20010418204021.A14531@se1.cogenit.fr>
2001-04-20 8:22 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-20 10:25 ` Francois Romieu
2001-04-20 11:30 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-20 14:05 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-20 14:33 ` Francois Romieu
2001-04-20 15:57 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-20 16:45 ` Francois Romieu [this message]
2001-04-20 20:13 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-20 11:09 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-20 11:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-20 12:07 ` Stefan Jaschke
2001-04-20 8:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010420184505.F32759@se1.cogenit.fr \
--to=romieu@cogenit.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@jaschke-net.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox