public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Disconnect <lkml@sigkill.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, arjan@fenrus.demon.nl
Subject: Re: Athlon problem report summary
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 11:07:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010421110717.A5804@sigkill.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010420203029.C20176@sigkill.net> <E14qlMO-0002bj-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E14qlMO-0002bj-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> I wrote a set of programs to tune the MMX code. Arjan I suspect did similar
> when he reoptimised the code for the newer Athlon. Simple stuff like

Alan - your proggy ran (no output) for about 5 seconds or so, then exited.

Arjan - from yours, I get the results below.  Either way, no OOPs, no
errors, etc.  (Felt pretty silly as I remounted all my drives and brought
it back up to multi-user mode ;) ..)

So am I correct in assuming at this point that MMX is working fine on this
mobo/chip combo?  What's next?


Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $
clear_page() tests
clear_page function 'warm up run'        took 16151 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 non MMX'        took 11893 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'   took 11736 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX version'    took 10436 cycles per page
clear_page function 'faster_clear_page'  took 4998 cycles per page
clear_page function 'even_faster_clear'  took 4881 cycles per page

copy_page() tests
copy_page function 'warm up run'         took 17595 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 non MMX'         took 26701 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'    took 26708 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX version'     took 17649 cycles per page
copy_page function 'faster_copy'         took 10480 cycles per page
copy_page function 'even_faster'         took 10464 cycles per page


-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1 [www.ebb.org/ungeek]
GIT/CC/CM/AT d--(-)@ s+:-- a-->? C++++$ ULBS*++++$ P+>+++ L++++>+++++ 
E--- W+++ N+@ o+>$ K? w--->+++++ O- M V-- PS+() PE Y+@ PGP++() t 5--- 
X-- R tv+@ b++++>$ DI++++ D++(+++) G++ e* h(-)* r++ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-04-21 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.fkfenov.14jqeov@ifi.uio.no>
2001-04-16 12:30 ` Athlon problem report summary Alan Cox
2001-04-16 12:33   ` Alan Cox
2001-04-16 13:17   ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-04-20 23:52   ` Disconnect
2001-04-21  0:14     ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21  0:22       ` Disconnect
2001-04-21  0:28         ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21  0:30           ` Disconnect
2001-04-21  0:34             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-21  9:27               ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-04-21 15:07               ` Disconnect [this message]
     [not found]   ` <fa.fn57bnv.nno4p4@ifi.uio.no>
2001-04-21  2:54     ` Jeff Lightfoot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010421110717.A5804@sigkill.net \
    --to=lkml@sigkill.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arjan@fenrus.demon.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox