From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Manuel McLure <manuel@mclure.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:18:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010422131803.C20807@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010421211722.C976@ulthar.internal.mclure.org> <E14rIiE-0005h2-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E14rIiE-0005h2-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:11:31PM +0100
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:11:31PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> This is from Linus tree. You currently need gcc 2.96 or higher to build
> the 2.4.x kernel.
Which goes back to the old argument that 2.96 is a redhat-ism and not a
real compiler.
To date, no 2.96 version of gcc works properly on ARM, and I for one don't
have the expertise necessary to fix gcc myself. Do you recommend that I
stop all ARM work because of this? ;(
Anyway, the work around is a trivial one that I've already posted to the
list, including the necessary GCC version tests. Additionally David
Howells has posted a patch to remove the __builtin_expect stuff, so
this is a non-issue now.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-22 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-22 2:53 Linux 2.4.3-ac12 Alan Cox
2001-04-22 4:17 ` Manuel McLure
2001-04-22 5:47 ` junio
2001-04-22 6:07 ` junio
2001-04-22 10:42 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 12:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 12:43 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 12:54 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 13:00 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 13:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 13:22 ` Russell King
2001-04-22 13:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 16:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-22 16:30 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-04-22 17:27 ` Roman Zippel
2001-04-22 17:43 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-22 18:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-23 6:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-04-22 13:51 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 12:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 12:18 ` Russell King [this message]
2001-04-22 12:51 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 12:55 ` John Jasen
2001-04-22 13:00 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 8:57 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2001-04-22 12:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 13:04 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2001-04-22 16:25 ` John Cavan
2001-04-22 17:07 ` Manuel McLure
2001-04-22 18:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 18:57 ` Manuel McLure
2001-04-22 18:59 ` Linux 2.4.3-ac12 unresolved symbol rwsem J Sloan
2001-04-23 0:19 ` Linux 2.4.3-ac12 John Cavan
2001-04-23 8:35 ` Byeong-ryeol Kim
2001-04-23 22:18 ` Byeong-ryeol Kim
2001-04-22 22:46 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-22 13:48 f5ibh
2001-04-22 14:03 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-04-22 17:26 Dieter Nützel
2001-04-22 19:53 ` J . A . Magallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010422131803.C20807@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manuel@mclure.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox